http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/SC/14/12/2014BCSC1214.htm

249] I am unable to conclude from the evidence that Uranium’s failure to disclose its agreement to the Uranium-3.0 assignment was inadvertent. Uranium remained silent and conducted itself as if it had not agreed on September 17, 2013 to the Uranium-3.0 assignment. As a result of Uranium’s failure to promptly disclose the Uranium-3.0 assignment or take any course of action in that regard, the injunction hearing set for a full court day on December 5, 2013 had to be rescheduled. The plaintiffs did not suggest that the details of Uranium’s plan of arrangement with Alpha, and specifically the fact that it included the Uranium-3.0 assignment, were confidential and could not be disclosed. As indicated above, they advanced no explanation in their submissions and led no evidence in this regard. However, even if the Uranium-3.0 assignment somehow could not be publically disclosed, there remained other courses of action available to Uranium than the one it took.