06:06:12 EDT Mon 16 Jun 2025
Enter Symbol
or Name
USA
CA



Royal Bank of Canada
Symbol RY
Shares Issued 1,442,073,027
Close 2012-04-04 C$ 57.19
Market Cap C$ 82,472,156,414
Recent Sedar Documents

Royal Bank's Voldeng receives no-solicitation order

2012-04-05 14:19 ET - Street Wire

This item is part of Stockwatch's value added news feed and is only available to Stockwatch subscribers.

Here is a sample of this item:

by Mike Caswell

Edward Jones has won an injunction in the Supreme Court of British Columbia restricting ex-employee Randy Voldeng from soliciting his former clients. The firm claimed that Mr. Voldeng had defected to RBC Dominion Securities Inc. and was contacting Edward Jones clients in a bid to have them switch firms. Accounts valued at $4-million were already being transferred to RBC, the firm complained.

The injunction, handed down by Justice Barbara Fisher on Tuesday, April 3, comes just weeks after Mr. Voldeng and his assistant, Brenda Jarvis, resigned from Edward Jones's branch in Oak Bay, a wealthy suburb of Victoria. They left on March 12 and the next day sent letters to a number of the 705 clients that Mr. Voldeng had served, explaining that Mr. Voldeng had left Edward Jones and would be moving to RBC. The letters included updated contact information, and explained that Mr. Voldeng could provide "even better solutions" at RBC.

Edward Jones sued Mr. Voldeng and Ms. Jarvis on March 22, 2012, complaining that the letters constituted a solicitation of clients, something that Mr. Voldeng had agreed not to do in his employment agreement. The agreement stated that should he leave Edward Jones for any reason, he would not solicit the firm's clients for six months. Client lists are a "trade secret, and are the sole and exclusive property of Edward Jones," the agreement stated. Edward Jones sought (and has now won) an injunction to enforce the agreement.

The remainder is available to Stockwatch subscribers.
Sign-up for a FREE 30-day Stockwatch subscription and SEE NO ADS

© 2025 Canjex Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.


Reader Comments - Comments are open to paying subscribers of Stockwatch and unmoderated, although libelous remarks, obscene language and impersonations may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Stockwatch.
For information regarding Canadian libel law, please view the University of Ottawa's FAQ regarding Defamation and SLAPPs.


certainly adds confidence to the minds of ordinary investors when a judge has to come to the rescue of investors to stop some dweeb who cannot stick to a written agreement- just imagine the other agreements these 2 dweebs are breaking ... whens the sanctions going to be handed down for this conduct? Add to this question when is the vectorvest ad going to be pulled by the securities commission? the securities acts within Canada all clearly state 18+ to invest, and just now on BNN the same ad plays with the little kid claiming trading success and Oh wait for it- giving unsolicited advice to his mommy on what stocks to buy...another company without scrupples and not following the laws of the land.

Posted by zeeb at 2012-04-09 09:34

Clients deal with the Investment Advisor not the Firm. The Judge got this one wrong.She drank the the firm's coolaid.The Firm does not own the client's decissions. The Client seeks advise and direction from the Advisor not the Firm. This decision by Edward Jones is arrogance at it's best. Like most firms their actions are with complete disregard for the client.If the client was dissatisfied with the Advisor they would have departed. There is honour and trust between the Advisor and the client. The honour and respect is void between the advisor and Firm management.

Posted by bvwbmo at 2012-04-09 09:39

Once again a judge shows zero understanding of the business. The firm has no relationship with the client. The relationship is between the broker and the client.

Posted by BS at 2012-04-10 10:37


Comments for this item are closed