IIROC imposes $20,000 fine on Research ex Ahrens
2014-10-28 19:32 ET - Street Wire
Not available.
© 2024 Canjex Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.
Reader Comments - Comments are open to paying subscribers of Stockwatch and unmoderated,
although libelous remarks, obscene language and impersonations may be deleted.
Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Stockwatch.
For information regarding Canadian libel law, please view the
University of Ottawa's FAQ regarding Defamation and SLAPPs.
fire everyone involved from their jobs and then force them to legally defend themselves. then make false and outlandish allegations while withholding evidence and declare the evidence as irrelevant and then find the involved individuals have acted contrary to public interest which they have to show no evidence to the panel. welcome to the world of a subjective, biased, process where one has no basic legal rights.
Posted by bottomfisher at 2014-10-30 14:12
fire everyone involved from their jobs and then force them to legally defend themselves. then make false and outlandish allegations while withholding evidence and declare the evidence as irrelevant and then find the involved individuals have acted contrary to public interest which they have to show no evidence to the panel. welcome to the world of a subjective, biased, process where one has no basic legal rights.
Posted by bottomfisher at 2014-10-30 14:13
copy and paste this url on a decision by bcsc not to allow Mr Myatovic to introduce new evidence that was withheld by bcsc and iiroc at his notice of hearing.
http://do.bcsc.bc.ca/comdoc.nsf/0/20c38c9ebe364c6d88257d39007a2c92/$FILE/2014%20BCSECCOM%20348.pdf
some exerts from the decision:
On May 22, 2014, Myatovic applied to the Commission to introduce evidence at
the review hearing that was not before the IIROC panel. On July 11, 2014, at the
direction of the Commission, Myatovic filed further written materials in support
of his application, and asked the Commission to issue summonses to four
witnesses who did not testify at the IIROC proceedings.
5 On July 25, 2014, IIROC applied for an order refusing Myatovic’s request that the Commission issue the summonses.
6 On August 12, 2014, the Commission heard further submissions from the
parties.
Ruling
7 We have reviewed the materials filed by the parties and considered the written and oral submissions, and:
1. we grant IIROC’s application and decline to issue summonses to the four
witnesses; and
2. we dismiss Myatovic’s application to introduce further evidence.
Posted by bottomfisher at 2014-10-30 14:27
these incestuous relationships amongst the regulators require proper cross-checks and balances. who regulates the regulators?
Posted by bottomfisher at 2014-10-30 14:36
Official witch hunts are job protection for the enforcement staff of all the Securities Commissions and IIROC.
Posted by stock pro at 2014-10-31 13:24
Comments for this item are closed