Augen and Mason sue over Stockhouse postings
2011-07-26 13:53 ET - Street Wire
Not available.
© 2025 Canjex Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.
Reader Comments - Comments are open to paying subscribers of Stockwatch and unmoderated,
although libelous remarks, obscene language and impersonations may be deleted.
Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Stockwatch.
For information regarding Canadian libel law, please view the
University of Ottawa's FAQ regarding Defamation and SLAPPs.
Not another one...what a waste of time and money.
Posted by Du-rag at 2011-07-26 15:23
Oh pluheeze.
Posted by ron at 2011-07-27 09:27
A person operating or owning a private company should have at law all the rights of privacy, both of actions and of character that the best legal system can provide.
However many of those legal rights should be removed when a person decides by free choice, to operate or majority own a public company. A public company is suppose to be operated for the benefit or shareholders equally and especially the general minority public shareholders.
All actions and decisions of management and directors of public companies should be open for public discussion; including all forms of payments, options, salary, expenses and capital expenditures etc. If a public person wants to call any action crap; idiotic, or whatever, it should be allowed under the right of public free speech.
For example if the manager of Man United football club (public company) did an idiotic transfer, underperformed or became incompetent; or if the directors loaded debt on the company ; are the public fans to be disallowed the right to comment on such actions ?
All managers, officers and directors who decide by personal free choice, to run public companies; should be held to the highest level of public discourse, accountability and criticism as possible including all items of integrity. Performance speaks for itself, both good and bad.
If they can not take the heat; they should not be firefighters. All such managers have the choice and right to stay private and build private companies.
The public is well served by having open public discussion on public boards, including open public criticism of management’s actions.
Posted by Mr. Public Shareholder at 2011-07-28 08:53
Read some of the messages they are suing about...pathetic! I see no slander...sounds like Mr. Mason has some pretty thin skin. The fact is, the big institutions that own GLD have voted and its not for the current status quo - A group of Augen shareholders consisting of Libra Advisors LLC, Sprott Asset Management LP, Augen Capital Corp., Mineralfields 2010-V Inc., Pathway Multiseries Fund LP, Sheldon Inwentash, Lynn Factor and Dr. Andrew Budning, representing an aggregate of 42 per cent of the issued and outstanding Augen shares, have entered into lock-up agreements in support of the offer.
Posted by Du-rag at 2011-07-28 14:00
Comments for this item are closed