23:29:37 EDT Thu 04 Jun 2026
Enter Symbol
or Name
USA
CA



SEC's penalty against "King Richards" upheld

2026-06-04 19:35 ET - Street Wire

See Street Wire (U-*SEC) U S Securities and Exchange Commission

This item is part of Stockwatch's value added news feed and is only available to Stockwatch subscribers.

Here is a sample of this item:

by Mike Caswell

The Supreme Court of the United States has upheld the $3.3-million disgorgement award that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission won against Ongkaruck Sripetch, the Washington State stock tout known as "King Richards." (All figures are in U.S. dollars.) The SEC claimed that Mr. Sripetch helped to boost VMS Rehab Systems Inc., an Ottawa company that supposedly made orthopedic seat cushions. Mr. Sripetch and three Canadians realized at least $6.6-million in illegal gains as paid tout sheets said the stock would be "soaring by over 200%."

The loss for Mr. Sripetch is contained in a decision that the Supreme Court released on Thursday, June 4. The court has upheld an April 17, 2024, judgment that ordered Mr. Sripetch to disgorge $2.25-million in gains, plus interest (making it a $3.3-million judgment at the time). The Supreme Court's decision, which represents the last step in a lengthy appeal process, was a unanimous one.

For securities law enthusiasts, the appeal resolved a long-outstanding legal issue -- the ability of the SEC to collect ill-gotten gains without proving that any victims suffered a loss. Mr. Sripetch had complained that the SEC did not provide any evidence that investors were harmed, nor did it identify any victims or set out their losses. For its part, the SEC said that it was not required to show that any victims suffered a loss. It only needed to show that a violator realized a gain from his actions.

The remainder is available to Stockwatch subscribers.
Sign-up for a FREE 30-day Stockwatch subscription and SEE NO ADS

© 2026 Canjex Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.


Reader Comments - Comments are open to paying subscribers of Stockwatch and unmoderated, although libelous remarks, obscene language and impersonations may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Stockwatch.
For information regarding Canadian libel law, please view the University of Ottawa's FAQ regarding Defamation and SLAPPs.


"For securities law enthusiasts, the appeal resolved a long-outstanding legal issue -- the ability of the SEC to collect ill-gotten gains without proving that any victims suffered a loss."

It's doubtful if the SEC is any more successful in collecting their disgorgement awards than is the abysmal collection efforts of the Canadian securities commissions.

Posted by halcrow at 2026-06-04 19:49