07:07:10 EDT Sun 28 Apr 2024
Enter Symbol
or Name
USA
CA



SEC's penalties "far beyond reasonable," says Friesen

2024-03-06 23:50 ET - Street Wire

This item is part of Stockwatch's value added news feed and is only available to Stockwatch subscribers.

Here is a sample of this item:

by Mike Caswell

Jackson Friesen, a Vancouver-area man facing a "colossal" $17.4-million judgment request from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for a scheme on the U.S. markets, says that the amount of money the SEC is seeking is far beyond reasonable. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.) The money stems from a scheme in which Mr. Friesen unloaded shares during a paid promotion of a supposed biotech listing. According to the SEC, he dumped the stock through an offshore service run by West Vancouver's Frederick Sharp.

The only remaining matter for Mr. Friesen is the magnitude of his penalty, a Boston jury having previously found him liable for the scheme. To that end, the SEC is asking that the judge order him to pay $17.4-million, with the amount to include disgorgement of $11.8-million in gains, plus interest, and a $1.5-million fine. The SEC is also asking that the judge permanently ban Mr. Friesen from penny stocks.

Mr. Friesen, of course, sees the matter much differently. In a response filed on March 1, 2024, he says that there is no basis for the SEC to pursue such a sizable judgment against him. Lacking "meaningful proof of actual profits or gains," the regulator has based its claim a "reasonable approximation of profits," Mr. Friesen contends. According to Mr. Friesen, the evidence shows him receiving a relatively small amount, of under $200,000.

The remainder is available to Stockwatch subscribers.
Sign-up for a FREE 30-day Stockwatch subscription and SEE NO ADS

© 2024 Canjex Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.


Reader Comments - Comments are open to paying subscribers of Stockwatch and unmoderated, although libelous remarks, obscene language and impersonations may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Stockwatch.
For information regarding Canadian libel law, please view the University of Ottawa's FAQ regarding Defamation and SLAPPs.