14:58:01 EST Thu 29 Jan 2026
Enter Symbol
or Name
USA
CA



CO2 Tech's Krome pleads guilty

2012-01-16 14:23 ET - Street Wire

Also Street Wire (U-*SEC) U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

This item is part of Stockwatch's value added news feed and is only available to Stockwatch subscribers.

Here is a sample of this item:

by Mike Caswell

Michael Krome, the New York lawyer charged for writing fraudulent opinion letters in the CO2 Tech Ltd. market manipulation, has pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud. He entered the plea in a 35-minute appearance before a judge in Miami on Friday, Jan. 13.

Prosecutors allege that Mr. Krome and others, including recidivist securities violator Jonathan Curshen, were part of a 2007 scheme to boost CO2 Tech with false claims about a pollution control product in which Boeing had purportedly taken an interest. The men pumped the stock to $1.65 and obtained $7-million in illegal profits, according to the government. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.) Also named in the scheme was former Pacific International Securities Inc. broker David Ricci, who is a defendant in a parallel civil suit from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

According to prosecutors, Mr. Krome, 49, wrote fraudulent opinion letters that allowed his co-defendants to obtain 22.5 million tradable shares in CO2 Tech, many of which they sold during the promotion. He also tried to conceal their identities in subsequent interviews with the SEC. Mr. Krome had initially pleaded not guilty to the charges. He is now scheduled for sentencing on Wednesday, May 9, and remains free on a $100,000 appearance bond. The maximum sentence is five years in jail.

The remainder is available to Stockwatch subscribers.
Sign-up for a FREE 30-day Stockwatch subscription and SEE NO ADS

© 2026 Canjex Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.


Reader Comments - Comments are open to paying subscribers of Stockwatch and unmoderated, although libelous remarks, obscene language and impersonations may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Stockwatch.
For information regarding Canadian libel law, please view the University of Ottawa's FAQ regarding Defamation and SLAPPs.


Comments for this item are closed