01:00:16 EDT Fri 17 May 2024
Enter Symbol
or Name
USA
CA



SEC wins default judgment against Winick

2010-10-01 13:24 ET - Street Wire

Also Street Wire (U-*SEC) U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

This item is part of Stockwatch's value added news feed and is only available to Stockwatch subscribers.

Here is a sample of this item:

by Mike Caswell

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has won a default judgment against Sandy Winick, the Toronto man facing civil charges in New York for improperly creating 59 shell companies and selling them. The SEC sought the judgment earlier this year, stating that Mr. Winick had not answered the 15-month-old case. U.S. District Court Judge George Daniels granted the SEC's request on Sept. 30, 2010, and referred the case to a magistrate judge to determine damages.

The SEC claims that Mr. Winick, over a two-year period, amassed an inventory of public shells by creating spinoffs from a public company he controlled, First Canadian American Holding Corp. He sold the spinoffs at prices between $50,000 and $100,000. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.) At least six of those shells later became targets of regulatory action. The SEC halted five of them in Operation Spamalot, a crackdown on spam stocks, and it launched an enforcement case against another, ZNext Mining Corp., in 2009.

The remainder is available to Stockwatch subscribers.
Sign-up for a FREE 30-day Stockwatch subscription and SEE NO ADS

© 2024 Canjex Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.


Reader Comments - Comments are open to paying subscribers of Stockwatch and unmoderated, although libelous remarks, obscene language and impersonations may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Stockwatch.
For information regarding Canadian libel law, please view the University of Ottawa's FAQ regarding Defamation and SLAPPs.


of course he will pay nothing

he is in singapore and his million plus dollar home is in his wife's name

she is here with the kids and he is in sinagpore

what a puke

he is a fraud artist

Posted by someone who knows him too well at 2010-10-01 17:44

I never understand these kind of cases. The person would not have filed all these spin off's unless there was a rule that was there allowed one to do this, then the company has to be approved by the regulators to trade, which means they should have stopped the scheme right there at the time. So the SEC is just as much in fault here, someone should sue the SEC.

Posted by Bewildered at 2010-10-01 21:59

while the SEC may be blameworthy, do not ever estimate the ability of fraud artists to spend their productive time trying to figure out how to get around rules

what the SEC should do is have teeth in canada and to seize the house because there is no way his wife could have bought that house

so suing the SEC does not solve this and let's another person get away with cheating innocent people and that is what he SEC should get into

Posted by someone who knows him too well at 2010-10-02 06:01

first sentence should say "underestimate" instead of just estimate

Posted by someone who knows him too well at 2010-10-03 06:09

His trouble is far from over.He should be in jail.One of the shells was sold to a european boiler room guy.They were pumping it and then they got busted.So maybe he is scared to travel as interpol is handling it and the boiler room owner was detained.Sandy is a criminal and should stay were he is.

Posted by boiler room bust linked to sandy at 2010-10-03 12:50

it runs in the family. check out his brother,marvin winick, ex c.a. also, his home in toronto has the largest indoor tropical fish plant in the world. $3.5 million.

Posted by palaceplace at 2010-10-04 17:50

yes marvin and sandy worked together

marvin is a disgraced accountant who still practices and is doing more public companies for people

sandy should be in jail - that is correct

Posted by someone who knows him too well at 2010-10-06 06:04

Does anyone know if there is any recourse for someone that bought stock?

Posted by john at 2010-11-18 08:59


Comments for this item are closed