17:27:33 EDT Fri 26 Apr 2024
Enter Symbol
or Name
USA
CA



SEC seeks $19.2-million (U.S.) judgment for Verdmont

2017-02-21 10:38 ET - Street Wire

Also Street Wire (U-*SEC) U S Securities and Exchange Commission
Also Street Wire (U-GOFF) Goff Corp
Also Street Wire (U-NORX) Norstra Energy Inc
Also Street Wire (U-SWVI) Swingplane Ventures Inc
Also Street Wire (U-XUII) Xumanii Inc

This item is part of Stockwatch's value added news feed and is only available to Stockwatch subscribers.

Here is a sample of this item:

by Mike Caswell

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has asked a New York judge to impose at least $19.2-million in sanctions against Verdmont Capital SA, the Vancouver-linked offshore brokerage accused of facilitating multiple pump-and-dumps. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.) The SEC says a substantial penalty is warranted, given the many red flags that Verdmont ignored in handling questionable stock sales. The firm accepted and sold large volumes of stock while aggressive promotional campaigns were under way, according to the SEC.

The proposed penalties come as part of case that the SEC has been pursuing for just over two years. The regulator claimed that Verdmont was part of a group of offshore brokerages that sold $75-million worth of shares in four listings in 2013. The selling occurred as unnamed others were touting the companies as active oil and gas or mining issuers.

The penalties, should the judge grant them, would be largely symbolic. Verdmont is no longer in business, and its affairs are managed by a receiver. The firm's only remaining asset is a $239,000 account in the U.S. that the SEC had frozen at the outset of the case.

The remainder is available to Stockwatch subscribers.
Sign-up for a FREE 30-day Stockwatch subscription and SEE NO ADS

© 2024 Canjex Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.


Reader Comments - Comments are open to paying subscribers of Stockwatch and unmoderated, although libelous remarks, obscene language and impersonations may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Stockwatch.
For information regarding Canadian libel law, please view the University of Ottawa's FAQ regarding Defamation and SLAPPs.


GOFF was all the Colombian Generals, and every spook in the world knew of the deal, it was spook financed, etc., so why SEC making up stories about GOFF, when it was a spook money laundering operation to get spook money to colombians?

Posted by achtung at 2017-02-21 18:23


Comments for this item are closed