This item is part of Stockwatch's value added news feed and is only available to Stockwatch subscribers.
Here is a sample of this item:
by Mike Caswell
The B.C. Securities Commission has upheld $126,813 in fines that Victoria broker Carolann Steinhoff received for placing a young couple into unsuitable investments, but has rejected a suspension. A BCSC panel has ruled that any meaningful suspension would be too severe a sanction, given that it could effectively ruin her career. The decision is a review of an earlier ruling by the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada which, in addition to the fine, had suspended her for one year.
The penalty, handed down on Friday, Jan. 17, marks the third time that IIROC and the BCSC have disagreed on an appropriate sanction for Ms. Steinhoff. In two prior rulings, the BCSC entirely overturned fines that IIROC had imposed on her. With Friday's ruling, the BCSC has left her fine intact, but has declined to impose a suspension that IIROC had found was necessary, given conduct it described as egregious.
The penalties handed down Friday stem from losses that a young Victoria couple suffered in the summer of 2008. They had approached Ms. Steinhoff to invest $125,000 that they were holding from the sale of their house. They needed the money for a down payment on a new house they were to buy in three months. Ms. Steinhoff invested the couple's down payment in stocks ranging from banks to junior mining companies, with a substantial amount of the investments purchased on margin. Unfortunately for the couple, the market suffered a severe downturn in August, 2008, and the couple incurred a $69,096 loss.
The remainder is available to Stockwatch subscribers.
Sign-up for a FREE 30-day Stockwatch subscription and SEE NO ADS
© 2025 Canjex Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.
these situations are all the same people cry like little babies when they lose but if they took that $125,000 to $250,000 everything have been just fine
Listen...I usually have not sympathy for investors that are grown-ups and NOT senile, but in this case by the summer of 2008 everybody in the business knew the junior market was in trouble and was not a good 3 month investment. In addition to that....DID she position the people in stocks where she held a position already and did she or her top clients benefit from the purchases made on behalf the 'new guys'? Key points. I hope in this case that the people got their money back.