10:56:53 EDT Wed 23 Jun 2021
Enter Symbol
or Name

Login ID:

IIROC cites Chippingham ex Drose after client loses $1M

2020-09-14 20:20 ET - Street Wire

This item is part of Stockwatch's value added news feed and is only available to Stockwatch subscribers.

Here is a sample of this item:

by Mike Caswell

The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada has begun a case against former Chippingham Financial Group Ltd. employee Alfred Drose, claiming that he used the account of a client with Alzheimer's disease to generate $231,782 in commissions. In the process, he inflicted $1.06-million in losses on the client, IIROC says. The loss represented most of the value of the client's account.

The allegations are contained in a notice of hearing that IIROC released on Monday, Sept. 14. The sole respondent is Mr. Drose, 62, who has worked in the industry on and off since 1983. The case centres on his largest client at Chippingham, only identified in the hearing notice as "GA." According to IIROC, the client was once a lawyer, but was forced into retirement by Alzheimer's disease. The condition of GA was well documented, with the Law Society of Ontario imposing an order ending GA's practice in 2012 because of his deteriorating health.

IIROC says that GA became one of Mr. Drose's clients on Feb. 14, 2014, opening an account that listed his investment objectives as entirely speculative with a risk tolerance of "100% high." Even though GA's law practice had ended two years prior, the account opening documentation listed his annual income as $90,000 and his occupation as that of a lawyer. IIROC says that Mr. Drose did nothing to verify GA's account opening information, and had no conversations with him after opening the account, only dealing with somebody who had power of attorney. GA made several deposits to the account, with the amounts totalling $1.3-million.

The remainder is available to Stockwatch subscribers.
Sign-up for a FREE 30-day Stockwatch subscription and SEE NO ADS

© 2021 Canjex Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.

Reader Comments - Comments are open to paying subscribers of Stockwatch and unmoderated, although libelous remarks, obscene language and impersonations may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Stockwatch.
For information regarding Canadian libel law, please view the University of Ottawa's FAQ regarding Defamation and SLAPPs.

Anyone know if the client has any chance of getting any money back?

Posted by mrhappyone at 2020-09-15 17:31