02:29:19 EST Sun 03 Dec 2023
Enter Symbol
or Name

Login ID:

SEC has jurisdiction over DIG tokens, judge finds

2023-04-05 20:29 ET - Street Wire

This item is part of Stockwatch's value added news feed and is only available to Stockwatch subscribers.

Here is a sample of this item:

by Mike Caswell

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has jurisdiction over a cryptocurrency at the centre of a Canadian-linked pump-and-dump, a U.S. federal judge has ruled. The SEC claims that a group of men, including Ontario's Troy Hogg, were behind a scheme with a virtual currency called DIG. The men touted DIG as being backed by $10-billion in gold bullion, and then unloaded $45-million worth of tokens, the SEC says. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.)

The case has yet to go to trial, with some of the defendants complaining that the SEC has no jurisdiction over cryptocurrency. The digital tokens that they sold have none of the characteristics of a security, they contended. They further said that the SEC created needless uncertainty for investors in filing the case, and asked that the matter be dismissed, without a trial.

Unfortunately for the group, the judge has found that the DIG tokens do fall under the SEC's jurisdiction. The decision rests largely in legalese. In short, the SEC has the power to regulate anything that constitutes a security. The issue then becomes one of whether the DIG tokens could be defined as a security. To that end, there is a legal test that the judge applied, with the outcome falling entirely in the SEC's favour.

The remainder is available to Stockwatch subscribers.
Sign-up for a FREE 30-day Stockwatch subscription and SEE NO ADS

© 2023 Canjex Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.

Reader Comments - Comments are open to paying subscribers of Stockwatch and unmoderated, although libelous remarks, obscene language and impersonations may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Stockwatch.
For information regarding Canadian libel law, please view the University of Ottawa's FAQ regarding Defamation and SLAPPs.

making up the law. picture this, a now judge in bc, stupidly and lazily added the customary vexatious to a statement of fact, signed it, had to hire another lawyer for defamation lawsuit, 6 lawyers all know it was criminal to add vexatious when the now judge knew the lawyer she represented broke the law, that is criminal defamation, but popcorn box winning masters, who themselves have an iq of lets go booze are allowed to sit in for judges, guess its the same as alleyways?

Posted by oh at 2023-04-06 11:17