07:47:02 EDT Fri 02 Jun 2023
Enter Symbol
or Name

Login ID:

SEC defendant Stack settles Marshall-linked charges

2022-09-16 20:49 ET - Street Wire

Also Street Wire (U-PSNP) Preston Corp

This item is part of Stockwatch's value added news feed and is only available to Stockwatch subscribers.

Here is a sample of this item:

by Mike Caswell

Texas lawyer William Stack, charged by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for a scheme run by former Vancouverite William Scott Marshall, has reached a deal to settle the case out of court. The SEC claimed that Mr. Stack acted as a nominee for Mr. Marshall, serving as the figurehead chief executive officer for a company with a supposed gold mine in Arizona. The company attempted to raise $5-million based on that mine, the SEC claimed. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.)

Mr. Stack's settlement is contained in a proposed judgment filed in federal court in Texas on Thursday, Sept. 15. The judgment bars him from future violations and includes the possibility of a fine, with the judge to determine the amount. In entering the settlement, Mr. Stack did not admit any wrongdoing.

The settlement with Mr. Stack comes as part of an investigation that traces back to Mr. Marshall. The SEC previously charged him for promoting the same Arizona mine, albeit through another company. The SEC claimed that he hired phone salesmen to pitch the project as a $273-million operation. The company in that case was an OTC Markets listing called Intertech Solutions Inc., which reached a $1.81 high in 2014 before dropping to subpenny status. Mr. Marshall and another defendant, B.C. resident David Naylor, agreed to pay $7.6-million to settle that case out of court. Neither man admitted any wrongdoing.

The remainder is available to Stockwatch subscribers.
Sign-up for a FREE 30-day Stockwatch subscription and SEE NO ADS

© 2023 Canjex Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.

Reader Comments - Comments are open to paying subscribers of Stockwatch and unmoderated, although libelous remarks, obscene language and impersonations may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Stockwatch.
For information regarding Canadian libel law, please view the University of Ottawa's FAQ regarding Defamation and SLAPPs.