17:37:46 EDT Fri 02 Jun 2023
Enter Symbol
or Name

Login ID:

SEC defendant Offill denies wrongdoing, blames others

2022-04-21 20:31 ET - Street Wire

This item is part of Stockwatch's value added news feed and is only available to Stockwatch subscribers.

Here is a sample of this item:

by Mike Caswell

Phillip Offill, a disbarred lawyer Texas lawyer charged by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for a scheme to steal and sell shares of an OTC Markets listing, denies that he did anything wrong. He claims that the case is about "venal, petty vindictiveness" and other ulterior motives. He says that others, facing legal troubles of their own, are using him to conceal their own scheme.

The statements by Mr. Offill, a past violator with Canadian connections, come in response to charges that the SEC brought against him for the sale of $1.3-million worth of shares in a purported Arizona mining company. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.) The SEC claimed that Mr. Offill obtained the stock with forged signatures. The scheme began shortly after Mr. Offill left prison for his part in a prior pump-and-dump scheme run by two Ontario men.

Mr. Offill's denials are contained an answer that he filed on April 12, 2022, in federal court in Texas. While the SEC claims that he was the perpetrator of the scheme, he portrays himself as the victim of circumstances. He says that his troubles go back to 2016, when he was released from prison. Upon his release, he contacted a former associate named John Bauska. He says that Mr. Bauska sought assistance identifying a shell to hold some mining claims that he had in Arizona. The company would have the backing of investors in Canada and the U.S.

The remainder is available to Stockwatch subscribers.
Sign-up for a FREE 30-day Stockwatch subscription and SEE NO ADS

© 2023 Canjex Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.

Reader Comments - Comments are open to paying subscribers of Stockwatch and unmoderated, although libelous remarks, obscene language and impersonations may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Stockwatch.
For information regarding Canadian libel law, please view the University of Ottawa's FAQ regarding Defamation and SLAPPs.

Comments for this item are closed