TSX: PFN OTCQX: PAWEF Frankfurt: P7J
www.pfncapital.com
-
River Valley Measured + Indicated resources: 91 million tonnes @ 0.58 g/t* palladium, 0.22 g/t platinum,
0.04 g/t gold at a cut-off grade of 0.8 g/t PdEq** for 2,463,000 ounces
PGM*** plus gold
-
River Valley Inferred resources: 36 million tonnes @ 0.36 g/t palladium, 0.14 g/t platinum,
0.03 g/t gold at a cut-off grade of 0.8 g/t PdEq for 614,000 ounces PGM
plus gold
-
On a PdEq basis, the Measured + Indicated resources contain 3,944,000 ounces PdEq and the Inferred resources contain 1,201,000 ounces PdEq
-
River Valley PGM-copper-nickel sulphide mineralized zones remain open to
expansion with continued exploration
|
* g/t= grams per tonne, **PdEq = palladium equivalent, *** PGM=Platinum
Group Metals
VANCOUVER, May 1, 2012 /CNW/ - Pacific North West Capital Corp. (TSX:
PFN; OTCQX: PAWEF; Frankfurt: P7J) is very pleased to announce that the
estimated NI43-101 compliant Measured and Indicated mineral resources at a cut-off grade of 0.80 g/t PdEq have increased by
>400% from the previous NI43-101 compliant mineral resource estimate
(May 2006) to 91,339,500 tonnes grading 0.84 g/t Pd+Pt+Au, 0.06%
copper, and 0.02% nickel. The compliant Inferred mineral resources have increased by >1000% to 35,911,000 Mt grading
0.53 g/t Pd+Pt+Au, 0.06% copper, and 0.03% nickel. The River Valley PGM
Project is located 100 km from the world-renown Sudbury Ni-Cu-PGM
Mining Camp, has excellent infrastructure support, and is 100% owned by
PFN.
Detailed Results
The detailed results of the new mineral resources estimate for the River
Valley PGM Project are presented in Table 1. This NI43-101 compliant
mineral resource estimate was completed by Tetra Tech, Sudbury. The
new estimate incorporates the 13,140 metres in 46 holes drilled in the
Dana North and Dana South Zones since the May 2006 estimate. All 462
holes were drilled at a sectional spacing of 25 metres to 100 metres on
the eight separate mineralized zones shown in Figure 1.
Dr. William Stone, President & COO, comments, "The large increase in the estimated mineral resources confirms that
River Valley is one of the largest undeveloped primary PGM Projects in
North America. The strategy of including all the mineralized zones and
the full value of the metal suite in the mineral resource estimation
produced a very positive result. It greatly increases PFN's confidence
in River Valley as the project is advanced toward a Preliminary
Economic Assessment Study. The Company plans to further expand the PGM
resources and to discover new resources with more drilling at the River
Valley Project and its adjacent properties."
The mineral resources were estimated using Datamine Studio3© software and are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.8 g/t PdEq (Table 1).
The 0.8 g/t PdEq cut-off was used pending future assessment of the
economics and development potential of River Valley as an open pit
mining project. The Company considers the 0.8 g/t cut-off value to be
appropriate because: 1) the PdEq grade is 1.38 g/t for Measured and
Indicated and 1.07 g/t for Inferred resources; and 2) rhodium and
silver are not included in the PdEq calculation. The mineral resources
are listed at a range of PdEq cut-off values in Table 2.
Comparisons are made above to the previous NI43-101 compliant River
Valley mineral resource estimate of May 2006 (Technical Report by
GeoSIMS available on PFN's SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com and on the Company's website). The large increase in the mineral
resources reported herein is explained by the combined effects of: 1)
incorporation of the 2011 resource drilling results; 2) inclusion of
three mineralized zones that were previously overlooked (Figure 1); 3)
use of PdEq rather than Pd+Pt cut-off grades; and 4) use of a
length-weighted average Specific Gravity value of 2.94 measured for
River Valley rather than the previous value of 2.89.
Figure 1. Location of the eight mineralized zones in the Breccia Unit at the base
of the River Valley Intrusion, Sudbury area, Ontario. The Banshee, Azen
and Razor PGM-Cu-Ni mineralized zones were not included in the previous
NI43-101 compliant mineral resource estimation (May 2006).
Harry Barr, Chairman & CEO, states, "In only one year since regaining 100% ownership of the River Valley PGM
Project, I want to congratulate our team for completion of a major
milestone by delivering a very positive resource statement. Our
aggressive exploration and development strategy aims to unlock the true
potential of River Valley. Going forward, our plans are to continue
exploration to expand the resource, drill test new targets, and
complete a preliminary economic assessment in the next 2 years."
Table 1. NI43-101 Compliant Mineral Resources for the River Valley PGM
Project, Sudbury, Ontario
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Measured |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Contained Metal |
| Zone | PdEq Cut-off | TONNES | Pd | Pt | Rh | Au | Ag | Cu | Ni | Co | PdEq | PGM+Au | PdEq |
|
| (g/t) |
| (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (g/t) | (oz) | (oz) |
|
Azen
|
0.80
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Banshee
|
0.80
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Dana North |
0.80
|
9,622,180
|
0.66
|
0.24
|
0.023
|
0.05
|
0.70
|
0.07
|
0.02
|
0.003
|
1.56
|
295,747
|
468,612
|
| Dana South |
0.80
|
5,980,550
|
0.79
|
0.26
|
0.027
|
0.05
|
0.56
|
0.06
|
0.01
|
0.003
|
1.68
|
210,735
|
313,237
|
|
Lismer
|
0.80
|
9,982,120
|
0.50
|
0.20
|
0.018
|
0.04
|
0.40
|
0.05
|
0.02
|
0.003
|
1.24
|
235,646
|
386,598
|
|
Lismer Extension
|
0.80
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Razor
|
0.80
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Varley
|
0.80
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Total Measured | | 25,584,850 | 0.63 | 0.23 | 0.022 | 0.04 | 0.55 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.003 | 1.46 | 742,127 | 1,168,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Indicated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Contained Metal |
| Zone | PdEq Cut-off | TONNES | Pd | Pt | Rh | Au | Ag | Cu | Ni | Co | PdEq | PGM+Au | PdEq |
|
| (g/t) |
| (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (g/t) | (oz) | (oz) |
|
Azen
|
0.80
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Banshee
|
0.80
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Dana North |
0.80
|
14,076,300
|
0.60
|
0.22
|
0.021
|
0.04
|
0.52
|
0.07
|
0.02
|
0.003
|
1.45
|
392,562
|
635,796
|
| Dana South |
0.80
|
8,040,000
|
0.70
|
0.24
|
0.024
|
0.04
|
0.59
|
0.05
|
0.01
|
0.003
|
1.49
|
252,029
|
373,248
|
|
Lismer
|
0.80
|
16,300,300
|
0.48
|
0.19
|
0.018
|
0.04
|
0.05
|
0.06
|
0.02
|
0.003
|
1.25
|
371,212
|
638,230
|
|
Lismer Extension
|
0.80
|
13,690,300
|
0.57
|
0.23
|
0.021
|
0.04
|
0.12
|
0.06
|
0.02
|
0.002
|
1.37
|
365,153
|
586,774
|
|
Razor
|
0.80
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Varley
|
0.80
|
13,647,800
|
0.53
|
0.21
|
0.019
|
0.03
|
0.17
|
0.05
|
0.01
|
0.002
|
1.27
|
339,978
|
540,424
|
| Total Indicated | | 65,754,700 | 0.56 | 0.21 | 0.020 | 0.04 | 0.26 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.002 | 1.35 | 1,720,935 | 2,774,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Measured+Indicated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Contained Metal |
| Zone | PdEq Cut-off | TONNES | Pd | Pt | Rh | Au | Ag | Cu | Ni | Co | PdEq | PGM+Au | PdEq |
|
|
(g/t) |
|
(g/t) |
(g/t) |
(g/t) |
(g/t) |
(g/t) |
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
(g/t) |
(oz) |
(oz) |
|
Azen
|
0.80
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Banshee
|
0.80
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Dana North |
0.80
|
23,698,480
|
0.63
|
0.23
|
0.022
|
0.04
|
0.59
|
0.07
|
0.02
|
0.003
|
1.49
|
688,309
|
1,104,408
|
| Dana South |
0.80
|
14,020,550
|
0.74
|
0.25
|
0.025
|
0.04
|
0.58
|
0.05
|
0.01
|
0.003
|
1.57
|
462,764
|
686,484
|
|
Lismer
|
0.80
|
26,282,420
|
0.49
|
0.19
|
0.018
|
0.04
|
0.18
|
0.06
|
0.02
|
0.003
|
1.25
|
606,858
|
1,024,827
|
|
Lismer Extension
|
0.80
|
13,690,300
|
0.57
|
0.23
|
0.021
|
0.04
|
0.12
|
0.06
|
0.02
|
0.002
|
1.37
|
365,153
|
586,774
|
|
Razor
|
0.80
|
-
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
-
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
-
|
0.00
|
-
|
-
|
|
Varley
|
0.80
|
13,647,800
|
0.53
|
0.21
|
0.019
|
0.03
|
0.17
|
0.05
|
0.01
|
0.002
|
1.27
|
339,978
|
540,424
|
| Total Measured+Indicated | | 91,339,550 | 0.58 | 0.22 | 0.021 | 0.04 | 0.34 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.002 | 1.38 | 2,463,062 | 3,942,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Inferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Contained Metal |
| Zone | PdEq Cut-off | TONNES | Pd | Pt | Rh | Au | Ag | Cu | Ni | Co | PdEq | PGM+Au | PdEq |
|
| (g/t) |
| (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (g/t) | (oz) | (oz) |
|
Azen
|
0.80
|
16,095,000
|
0.37
|
0.15
|
0.014
|
0.03
|
0.08
|
0.05
|
0.03
|
0.001
|
1.11
|
285,081
|
559,956
|
|
Banshee
|
0.80
|
3,320,000
|
0.35
|
0.19
|
0.015
|
0.03
|
-
|
0.05
|
0.01
|
-
|
1.00
|
61,659
|
103,387
|
| Dana North |
0.80
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Dana South |
0.80
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Lismer
|
0.80
|
303,000
|
0.31
|
0.13
|
0.012
|
0.03
|
-
|
0.06
|
0.02
|
0.002
|
0.92
|
4,584
|
8,747
|
|
Lismer Extension
|
0.80
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Razor
|
0.80
|
16,163,000
|
0.36
|
0.12
|
0.013
|
0.02
|
0.16
|
0.06
|
0.03
|
0.003
|
1.05
|
262,468
|
528,164
|
|
Varley
|
0.80
|
30,000
|
0.30
|
0.15
|
0.012
|
0.03
|
-
|
0.07
|
0.01
|
0.002
|
0.94
|
459
|
882
|
| Total Inferred | | 35,911,000 | 0.36 | 0.14 | 0.014 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.002 | 1.07 | 614,252 | 1,201,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: due to rounding, some totals may not appear to total properly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of mineral resources may
be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title,
socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues.
|
Notes to Mineral Resources in Table 1
- The mineral resource estimates in this press release use the Canadian
Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), Standards on
Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines prepared by
CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by CIM
Council on November 27, 2010. The mineral resource estimates provided
in this report are classified as "measured", "indicated", or "inferred"
as defined by CIM. According to the CIM definitions, a Mineral Resource
must be potentially economic in that it must be "in such form and
quantity and of such grade or quality that it has reasonable prospects
for economic extraction".
-
For the River Valley project, a palladium equivalent (PdEq) cut-off
grade was assigned based on economic assumptions from comparisons to
other projects, and was used in the resource estimations. Resources
reported in this press release use a cut-off of 0.80 g/t PdEq. Grades
have assumed 100% recoveries. The parameters used to generate the PdEq
value are provided below:
PdEq=( (Au grade*$Au*Factor1)+(Pt grade*$Pt*Factor1)+(Pd
grade*$Pd*Factor1)+(Ni grade*$Ni*Factor2)+(Cu grade*$Cu*Factor2)
+(Co grade*$Co*Factor3))/($Pd*Factor1)
$Au = US$1271 per oz.
$Pt = US$1885 per oz.
$Pd = US$896 per oz.
$Ni = US$ 9.74 per lb.
$Cu = US$3.00 per lb.
$Co = US$15.90 per lb.
Factor1 = 0.0321508 (converts ounce per tonne to grams per tonne)
Factor2 = 22.04622 (converts pounds to grade percent)
Factor3 = 0.002205 (converts pounds to ppm)
-
The mineral resources were estimated using a block model with parent
blocks of 10m x 10m x 5m and using ordinary kriging (OK) methods for
grade estimation. A total of eight individual mineralized domains were
identified. The determination technique of the mineral resource is
based on the combination of geological modelling, geostatistics and
conventional block modelling using the OK method of grade
interpolation. The block model resource estimate prepared by the Tetra
Tech, was based on more than 96,980 metres of diamond drilling in 462
diamond drill holes. The assay data was reviewed and a composite
interval of 2.0 metres was used. Statistical and Variogram analyses
were performed to determine the "nugget effect".
-
Rhodium grades were not estimated by the OK methodology. Rhodium values
were determined using a regression formula based on the platinum and
palladium grades. Rhodium values are not incorporated into the PdEq
value. The PdEq value also does not include silver.
-
The QAQC protocols and corresponding sample preparation and shipment
procedures for the River Valley Project have been reviewed and approved
by Tetra Tech.
-
An NI43-101 compliant technical report will be filed on SEDAR within 45
days.
Table 2. River Valley Resource Tonnage at Selected PdEq Cut-Off Grades
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Measured |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PdEq CUT-OFF | TONNES | Pd (g/t) | Pt (g/t) | Rh (g/t) | Au (g/t) | Ag (g/t) | Cu (%) | Ni (%) | Co (%) | PdEq (g/t) |
|
0.30
|
52,189,120
|
0.40
|
0.16
|
0.015
|
0.03
|
0.47
|
0.04
|
0.01
|
0.003
|
0.99
|
|
0.50
|
40,576,180
|
0.48
|
0.18
|
0.017
|
0.03
|
0.49
|
0.05
|
0.01
|
0.003
|
1.16
|
|
0.80
|
25,584,850
|
0.63
|
0.23
|
0.022
|
0.04
|
0.55
|
0.06
|
0.02
|
0.003
|
1.46
|
|
1.00
|
18,785,450
|
0.74
|
0.26
|
0.026
|
0.05
|
0.58
|
0.07
|
0.02
|
0.003
|
1.67
|
|
1.20
|
13,791,240
|
0.85
|
0.30
|
0.029
|
0.05
|
0.62
|
0.07
|
0.02
|
0.003
|
1.87
|
|
1.40
|
10,202,730
|
0.96
|
0.33
|
0.032
|
0.06
|
0.65
|
0.08
|
0.02
|
0.003
|
2.08
|
|
1.60
|
7,614,580
|
1.07
|
0.36
|
0.036
|
0.07
|
0.68
|
0.08
|
0.02
|
0.003
|
2.28
|
|
1.80
|
5,569,280
|
1.19
|
0.39
|
0.039
|
0.07
|
0.71
|
0.09
|
0.02
|
0.003
|
2.49
|
|
2.00
|
4,145,280
|
1.31
|
0.42
|
0.043
|
0.08
|
0.73
|
0.09
|
0.02
|
0.003
|
2.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Indicated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PdEq CUT-OFF | TONNES | Pd (g/t) | Pt (g/t) | Rh (g/t) | Au (g/t) | Ag (g/t) | Cu (%) | Ni (%) | Co (%) | PdEq (g/t) |
|
0.30
|
141,557,300
|
0.36
|
0.15
|
0.014
|
0.03
|
0.20
|
0.04
|
0.01
|
0.002
|
0.93
|
|
0.50
|
114,501,900
|
0.42
|
0.16
|
0.016
|
0.03
|
0.22
|
0.05
|
0.01
|
0.002
|
1.05
|
|
0.80
|
65,754,600
|
0.56
|
0.21
|
0.020
|
0.04
|
0.26
|
0.06
|
0.02
|
0.002
|
1.35
|
|
1.00
|
43,959,900
|
0.68
|
0.25
|
0.024
|
0.04
|
0.29
|
0.07
|
0.02
|
0.002
|
1.58
|
|
1.20
|
30,943,200
|
0.78
|
0.29
|
0.027
|
0.05
|
0.32
|
0.07
|
0.02
|
0.002
|
1.78
|
|
1.40
|
21,704,500
|
0.89
|
0.32
|
0.031
|
0.06
|
0.35
|
0.08
|
0.02
|
0.002
|
1.99
|
|
1.60
|
15,202,500
|
1.01
|
0.36
|
0.034
|
0.06
|
0.38
|
0.08
|
0.02
|
0.002
|
2.20
|
|
1.80
|
10,991,500
|
1.11
|
0.39
|
0.038
|
0.07
|
0.41
|
0.09
|
0.02
|
0.002
|
2.40
|
|
2.00
|
7,811,200
|
1.22
|
0.43
|
0.041
|
0.07
|
0.43
|
0.09
|
0.02
|
0.002
|
2.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Inferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PdEq CUT-OFF | TONNES | Pd (g/t) | Pt (g/t) | Rh (g/t) | Au (g/t) | Ag (g/t) | Cu (%) | Ni (%) | Co (%) | PdEq (g/t) |
|
0.30
|
130,872,000
|
0.22
|
0.09
|
0.009
|
0.02
|
0.08
|
0.04
|
0.02
|
0.002
|
0.70
|
|
0.50
|
96,299,000
|
0.26
|
0.11
|
0.010
|
0.02
|
0.08
|
0.04
|
0.02
|
0.002
|
0.80
|
|
0.80
|
35,910,000
|
0.36
|
0.14
|
0.014
|
0.03
|
0.11
|
0.06
|
0.03
|
0.002
|
1.07
|
|
1.00
|
17,803,000
|
0.44
|
0.17
|
0.016
|
0.03
|
0.13
|
0.06
|
0.03
|
0.002
|
1.26
|
|
1.20
|
8,021,000
|
0.53
|
0.20
|
0.019
|
0.04
|
0.10
|
0.07
|
0.04
|
0.002
|
1.46
|
|
1.40
|
3,703,000
|
0.63
|
0.22
|
0.022
|
0.04
|
0.10
|
0.08
|
0.04
|
0.001
|
1.67
|
|
1.60
|
1,889,000
|
0.72
|
0.23
|
0.024
|
0.05
|
0.09
|
0.09
|
0.05
|
0.001
|
1.83
|
|
1.80
|
895,000
|
0.78
|
0.26
|
0.027
|
0.06
|
0.08
|
0.10
|
0.05
|
0.000
|
1.99
|
|
2.00
|
322,000
|
0.85
|
0.30
|
0.029
|
0.06
|
0.02
|
0.10
|
0.05
|
0.000
|
2.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: due to rounding, some totals may not appear to total properly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of mineral resources may
be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title,
socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues.
|
Qualified Persons Statement
The mineral resource estimate was prepared by Tetra Tech of Sudbury,
Ontario under the supervision of Todd McCracken, Principal Geologist.
Mr. McCracken is an independent qualified person as defined by
NI43-101. The effective date of the resource is May 1st, 2012.
The quality control, technical information and all aspects of the 2011
exploration program were supervised by Ali Hassanalizadeh, Vice
President, Exploration of PFN and a Qualified Person under NI43-101.
The information in this release was prepared under the direction of Dr.
William Stone, President & COO of PFN and a Qualified Person as defined
by NI43-101.
About River Valley Project
In January 2011, Pacific North West Capital Corp. successfully
negotiated the 100% acquisition of the River Valley PGM Project from
Anglo Platinum Limited. The River Valley Project is one of North America's most advanced
primary PGM deposits. The project has excellent infrastructure support
and is located 100 km from the city of Sudbury, Ontario, Canada's
largest nickel-copper-PGM mining and metal recovery centre.
About Pacific North West Capital Corp
PFN is a mineral exploration company whose philosophy is to be a project generator, explorer and project
operator in order to option/joint venture its projects through toproduction.PFN is focused on the discovery, exploration and development of PGM and
nickel-copper sulphide deposits in geologically prospective regions in
North America, particularly Canada. The Company's key asset is its 100%
owned River Valley PGM Project in the Sudbury region of northern
Ontario. PFN also has PGM and nickel-copper projects and properties in
northwest Ontario, Saskatchewan, and Alaska, and an option to joint
venture a base metal project in northwestern BC's Golden Triangle
region. The Company continues to evaluate PGM and nickel-copper properties and
projects in North America for potential acquisition opportunities.
On behalf of the Board of Directors
(signed)
Harry Barr
Chairman and CEO
Disclaimer: This news release may contain certain "Forward-Looking Statements"
within the meaning of Section 21E of the United States Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements, other than statements
of historical fact, included herein are forward-looking statements that
involve various risks and uncertainties. There can be no assurance that
such statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and
future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such
statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from the Company's expectations are disclosed in the
Company's documents filed from time to time with The Toronto Stock
Exchange, British Columbia Securities Commission and the United States
Securities & Exchange Commission.
<p> </p> <p> <b>please visit PFN's website at </b><a href="http://www.pfncapital.com" cr="true">www.pfncapital.com</a><b> or send requests to:</b> </p> <p> <b>Harry Barr</b><br/> <b>Chairman & CEO </b><br/> <b>Pacific North West Capital Corp. </b><br/> <b>Tel: 604-685-1870 </b><br/> <b>Email: </b><a href="mailto:hbarr@pfncapital.com">hbarr@pfncapital.com</a> </p> <p> <br/> <b>Bill Stone </b><br/> <b>President & COO </b><br/> <b>Pacific North West Capital Corp. </b><br/> <b>Tel: 416-368-5268 </b><br/> <b>Email: </b><a href="mailto:bstone@pfncapital.com" font-weight="bold">bstone@pfncapital.com</a><b> </b> </p>