22:22:18 EDT Wed 17 Apr 2024
Enter Symbol
or Name
USA
CA



Multivision Communications Corp (2)
Symbol MTV
Shares Issued 15,156,296
Close 2015-04-23 C$ 0.135
Market Cap C$ 2,046,100
Recent Sedar Documents

Multivision's Nazerali denies Imagis an "obvious pump"

2015-04-24 20:34 ET - Street Wire

This item is part of Stockwatch's value added news feed and is only available to Stockwatch subscribers.

Here is a sample of this item:

by Stockwatch Business Reporter

Aly Nazerali, the plaintiff in a libel trial against the Deep Capture website, was cross-examined on Friday about his role in what defence lawyer Roger McConchie dubbed the "obvious pump" of Imagis Technologies, a lively facial-recognition promotion from the early 2000s. To Mr. Nazerali's repeated denials, Mr. McConchie claimed that the go-private offer Imagis received from Treyton Thomas's Pembridge Group was clearly part of a pump-and-dump and that Mr. Nazerali knew "from day one" that Mr. Thomas was running a scam.

By way of background, Mr. Nazerali had previously testified that Imagis received a go-private offer from Pembridge on March 6, 2002. (The offer is of interest because on the day it was announced, Imagis's shares touched a 52-week high of $5.66, up $1.76 over the previous day.) All this came about shortly after Imagis hired Pembridge as a financial adviser on Jan. 3, 2002, Mr. Nazerali had said.

Mr. Nazerali's testimony is part of a lawsuit he is pursuing against Deep Capture, Patrick Byrne, Mark Mitchell and others over 21 chapters that appeared on-line in 2011. He complains that the chapters falsely accused him of, among other things, running a pump-and-dump of Imagis.

The remainder is available to Stockwatch subscribers.
Sign-up for a FREE 30-day Stockwatch subscription and SEE NO ADS

© 2024 Canjex Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.


Reader Comments - Comments are open to paying subscribers of Stockwatch and unmoderated, although libelous remarks, obscene language and impersonations may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Stockwatch.
For information regarding Canadian libel law, please view the University of Ottawa's FAQ regarding Defamation and SLAPPs.


Comments for this item are closed