SEC revokes Toronto brokerage Biremis over "gaming"
2012-12-19 12:41 ET - Street Wire
Also Street Wire (U-*SEC) U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
This item is part of Stockwatch's value added news feed and is only available to Stockwatch subscribers.
Here is a sample of this item:
by Mike Caswell
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has revoked now-defunct Toronto brokerage Biremis Corp. and fined its two principals, Peter Beck and Charles Kim, over manipulative trading that was designed to trick algorithmic traders. The SEC claimed that the firm failed to stop daytraders from using a manipulative practice called layering, which involved entering and cancelling multiple orders. Sanctions include a combined $500,000 in fines. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.)
The penalties are contained in an administrative order entered on Tuesday, Dec. 18. The order identifies Biremis as a Toronto firm affiliated with Swift Trade Inc. that had up to 5,000 daytraders in over 30 countries. Mr. Beck, 57, was the firm's co-founder and president, and Mr. Kim, 40, was a co-founder and vice-president.
The SEC claims that overseas daytraders using Biremis's platforms routinely used a practice called layering, in which they entered large numbers of orders that they did not intend to complete. The purpose of the orders was to trick other market participants, often those using algorithmic trades, into buying or selling a stock. Biremis generally collected 17 per cent of the profits that the traders made, the SEC says.
The remainder is available to Stockwatch subscribers.
© 2016 Canjex Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.
Reader Comments - Comments are open to paying subscribers of Stockwatch and unmoderated,
although libelous remarks, obscene language and impersonations may be deleted.
Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Stockwatch.
For information regarding Canadian libel law, please view the
University of Ottawa's FAQ regarding Defamation and SLAPPs.
so loading bids and offers outside the market is a nono, but the use of the algorithm trading that actually utilizes the info of bidding and offering outside the market is legal? LOL sounds like the algorithm trading platforms are manipulative software.
Posted by headscratching at 2012-12-19 19:08
It sounds like the trading algorithms are the real problem. People just found a way to beat the computer. There should be no computerized trading allowed on any markets. All orders should have to be entered manually by a trader. I find it funny they take exception to this but Icebergs are OK. That is truly gaming the market
Posted by BS at 2012-12-20 19:01
Comments for this item are closed