19:33:35 EDT Thu 18 Apr 2024
Enter Symbol
or Name
USA
CA



OSC files case against Telfer and others

2012-02-07 21:22 ET - Street Wire

Also Street Wire (C-G) Goldcorp Inc (2)

This item is part of Stockwatch's value added news feed and is only available to Stockwatch subscribers.

Here is a sample of this item:

by Mike Caswell

The Ontario Securities Commission has linked Goldcorp Inc. chairman Ian Telfer to an insider trading ring that the regulator claims netted $962,000 in illegal profits in 2007 and 2008. In a statement of allegations released on Tuesday, Feb. 7, the OSC says that Mr. Telfer provided advice to a former GMP Securities LP secretary on how to hide communications and disguise share ownership. He also helped her buy 500,000 shares in 222 Pizza Express Corp. that were later worth $500,000.

The allegations against Mr. Telfer are part of an insider trading case against Eda Agueci, the former executive assistant to the chairman at GMP Securities. The regulator claims that she learned ahead of time about takeovers and other as-yet unannounced deals for several companies and used the information to secretly buy the stocks. She also tipped friends and relatives, including four who worked at other brokerage firms.

Mr. Telfer did not have any direct role in the insider trading, but according to the OSC he was close friends with Ms. Agueci and on one occasion offered her cheap stock that later substantially rose in value. That purchase, as described in the statement of allegations, took place in April, 2008, when he gave her the opportunity to secretly buy 500,000 shares in 222 Pizza in a private offering. He was very optimistic about the prospects for the company, the OSC says.

The remainder is available to Stockwatch subscribers.
Sign-up for a FREE 30-day Stockwatch subscription and SEE NO ADS

© 2024 Canjex Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.


Reader Comments - Comments are open to paying subscribers of Stockwatch and unmoderated, although libelous remarks, obscene language and impersonations may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Stockwatch.
For information regarding Canadian libel law, please view the University of Ottawa's FAQ regarding Defamation and SLAPPs.


What a bunch of complete scumbags, especially Telfer

Posted by ron at 2012-02-08 01:50

So, showing someone how to work thier Blackberry PIN messeneger, and letting them buy a private placement is insider trading?

Looks like total BS allegations against Telfer.

Posted by Du-rag at 2012-02-08 11:44

NO WONDER THE GOLDCORP STOCK IS DROPPING. PEOPLE JUST DON'T BELIEVE IN THIS KIND OF SCAMING. I AM GLAD THAT THE OSC IS FINALLY DOING ITS JOB. IT ALL STARTED WITH THE 'ENRON' DISASTER WHEN THIS KIND OF BEHAVIOR BEGAN TO BE PUBLICLY CALLED 'UNETHICAL' AND YIELDED JAIL TERMS. TO BE SURE, IT ALWAYS WAS UNETHICAL. THAT IS WHY THE BIG SECRECY WAS CALLED FOR. TEFLER'S BEHAVIOR IS PERHAPS NOT QUITE ILLEGAL BUT CERTAINLY UNETHICAL. HE WILL HAVE TO WAIT VERY LONG TO LIVE THAT ONE DOWN. MAKES YOU WONDER ABOUT WHAT ELSE HE IS HIDING. PERHAPS THE BEST OPTION FOR GOLDCORP WOULD BE IF TEFLER RESIGNED VOLUNTARILY, BEFORE GETTING FORCED INTO RESIGNING.

Posted by OPA at 2012-02-08 16:20

He must have really pissed someone off at the OSC. I find it difficult to imagine that the allegations mentioned above would warrant a public ousting like this.

Posted by Herro at 2012-02-08 19:39

This all begs the question who regulates the regulators?????????

Posted by bottomfisher at 2012-02-09 09:48

Isn't it amazing how many posters find this unethical behavior quite excusable by pointing a finger at the OSC as the culprit, rather than at Telfer? Personnally, I find it rather inexcusable from a senior executive, and deserving of a jail term. It smells too much like this is the reason for the stock market having a bad reputation for ripping off investors.

Posted by OPA at 2012-02-09 13:39

Something does not sound right! Correct me if I'm wrong but he was tipping her off and she was making profits...he did not make any profits himself. Is there something missing here? Why was she getting this special treatment?

Posted by GaryColeman at 2012-02-09 18:33

Gary, please take a wild guess and you have your answer.

Posted by OPA at 2012-02-09 19:40

I guess there is no such thing as free sex

Posted by bluerock at 2012-02-10 10:05

Difficult to imagine that Telfer's behaviour merits a public ousting? If it was good enough for Martha Stewart than certainly it could appear well deserved by Telfer. Martha went to prison for far less money. I wonder if the same punishment awaits Telfer?

Posted by Book Critic at 2012-02-21 16:52


Comments for this item are closed