BCSC is a sham? Copy and paste this url and judge it for yourself. BCSC ruined the lives of BC residents and then canceled their fines. http://bcsecuritiescommissionasham.blogspot.ca/2016/03/be-fraud-aware-5-reasons-bc-securities.html

BRITISH COLUMBIA SECURITIES COMMISSION Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c. 418 Citation: Re SPYru Inc., 2018 BCSECCOM 24 Date: 20180115 SPYru Inc., Paradox Distributors (1992) Ltd., Echo Partners Ltd., U-GO Brands Nutritional Products Inc., Peter David Harris, Lorne Neil Cire, Christopher Andrew Burke, Millard Michael Kwasnek, and Joseph Yvan JeanClaude Thibert a.k.a. John Thibert Variation Order [1] On May 31, 2017, the BC Court of Appeal issued a judgment in Poonian v. British Columbia Securities Commission (2017 BCCA 207). In the judgment, the Court considered the interpretation of section 161(1)(g) of the Securities Act. [2] The Commission’s decision in Re SPYru Inc., 2015 BCSECCOM 452 includes orders under section 161(1)(g) of the Act. The facts in the decision raise issues that the Court of Appeal considered in the judgment. As the decision predates the judgment, the section 161(1)(g) orders in the decision were made without the benefit of the principles established by the judgment. [3] It is in the public interest that a section 161(1)(g) order that may be affected by the judgment be stayed until a party makes an application to the Commission under section 171 to lift the stay or to vary or revoke the order. At that time, the Commission will consider whether the order is consistent with the judgment. [4] Considering that it would not be prejudicial to the public interest to do so, the Commission, under section 171 of the Act, varies the decision by staying the order in: a. subsection 125(4) against Cire, b. subsection 125(9) against Harris, c. subsection 125(17) against Kwasnek, d. subsection 125(21) against Burke, and 2 e. subsection 125(30). January 15, 2018 For the Commission Brenda M. Leong Nigel P. Cave Chair Vice Chair