Justice Department Turnaround Will Harm Consumers and Limit
Competition

Company Website:
http://www.americanexpress.com
NEW YORK -- (Business Wire)
American Express (NYSE: AXP) said the antitrust lawsuit filed today
against the company is a significant retreat from previous Department of
Justice efforts to promote competition in the payments industry. The new
approach would ultimately limit consumer choice, reduce competition and
curtail innovation.
The government’s lawsuit claims that terms of American Express merchant
contracts, which protect cardmembers against discrimination and
disruption at the point of sale, violate U.S. antitrust laws.
The Justice Department’s proposed remedy would interfere with consumer
choice at the check-out counter by steering American Express cardmembers
to another payment network.
The government’s new legal theory ignores a key point that the Justice
Department previously made and that the courts have already decided:
American Express does not have the ability to force merchants to accept
its products or pricing.
“In today’s action, the Department has sued a party proven not to have
market power,” said Kenneth I. Chenault, chairman and chief executive
officer. “It represents an extraordinary retreat by the antitrust
division. Instead of promoting competition, it now seeks to promote
regulation that would ultimately limit competition.”
“We have no intention of settling the case,” said Mr. Chenault. “We will
defend the rights of our cardmembers at the point of sale and our own
ability to negotiate freely with merchants. We are confident that the
courts will recognize the perverse anti-competitive nature of the
government’s case and that we will continue providing a competitive,
superior service to cardmembers and merchants.”
“Whatever the intent, the government’s new approach would hand an unfair
advantage back to Visa and MasterCard,” Mr. Chenault said. “The Justice
Department would, in effect, be undoing its own six year fight
(1998-2004) to allow smaller payment networks like American Express to
provide a competitive choice to consumers and merchants.”
American Express, the choice of higher spending cardmembers, partners
with merchants who want to build business among these customers.
The company has invested billions of dollars to differentiate its
products and services from the competition. It succeeds by offering
superior customer service and innovative benefits, along with marketing
programs and analytical support for merchants who choose to accept the
card.
While virtually all American Express Cardmembers also carry products
from a competing network, they choose to use American Express because of
the service and value they receive.
“Not all merchants accept American Express Cards, but millions of them
find greater value in welcoming our products than in accepting Visa,
MasterCard and Discover exclusively,” said Mr. Chenault. “Those
merchants benefit from the investments we make to build strong
cardmember relationships and to profit from the increased revenues they
receive from these higher spending customers.”
When merchants agree to accept American Express they promise not to
‘bait and switch’ by advertising acceptance of American Express to
attract customers and then steering them to another means of payment at
the point of sale. While American Express negotiates many contracts that
allow merchants to run promotional campaigns with competing networks,
they do not permit disrupting cardmembers at the point of sale. The
government’s proposed solution would eliminate that protection.
“Instead of promoting competition, the government remedy would
ultimately wind up marginalizing it. The government’s one-sided remedy
would put more power in the hands of Visa and MasterCard, the networks
that steadily increased prices for credit card transactions over the
past decade, that control over 70 percent of the market and that have
ten times as many cards as American Express. Anyone familiar with
antitrust matters, would realize that in the real world such market
power would ultimately work to the disadvantage of merchants as well as
consumers.
“The sheer number of Visa and MasterCard credit cards, and the fact that
most of their customers do not carry an American Express product, makes
it virtually impossible for merchants to steer customers away from the
dominant networks, even if they have the right to do so.
“It is difficult to understand why the same agency that fought so
effectively to combat anti-competitive network conduct would now
undermine their own efforts by regulating our contracts in a way that
limits our ability to compete.” said Mr. Chenault.
American Express has retained Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, as well as
Cravath, Swaine and Moore LLP to serve as legal counsel.
Media & Investor Conference Call – Live Audio Webcast
A conference call with investors and with members of the media will be
held today to discuss this announcement at 4:15 PM EDT.
A live audio webcast of the conference call will be accessible at http://ir.americanexpress.com.
A replay of the call will be available at the same Web site address
shortly after the call.
About American Express
American Express is a global services company, providing customers with
access to products, insights and experiences that enrich lives and build
business success. Learn more at www.americanexpress.com

Contacts:
Media:
Mike O’Neill, 212-640–5951
mike.o’neill@aexp.com
Christine
Elliott, 212-640–0622
christine.s.elliott@aexp.com
or
Investors/Analysts:
Toby
Willard, 212-640-1958
sherwood.s.willardjr@aexp.com
Ron
Stovall, 212-640-5574
ronald.stovall@aexp.com
Source: American Express
© 2026 Canjex Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.