Tessera’s Plan Is Superior, Already Being Executed and Showing
Progress
Tessera Board Best Positioned to Execute the Plan Efficiently and
Expeditiously

Company Website:
http://www.tessera.com
SAN JOSE, Calif. -- (Business Wire)
Tessera Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSRA) ("Tessera" or the "Company")
today issued a letter to stockholders in connection with the Company’s
2013 Annual Meeting scheduled on May 23, 2013. In the letter, Tessera
reiterates the core elements of its plan to deliver value for
stockholders by focusing on enhancing and effectively monetizing its
intellectual property (“IP”) portfolio of advanced technology. The
letter also reaffirms the Company’s belief that the Tessera directors
are far more qualified and experienced to lead the Company through the
next phase of growth than the nominees proposed by a dissident
stockholder. Further, the Company believes that the dissident
stockholder’s strategic plan combined with their lack of familiarity and
experience with certain of Tessera’s major customers that are currently
well into license renewal negotiations would expose stockholders to
material downside risk in the near-term.
The full text of the May 3 letter follows:
Dear Tessera Stockholders:
The 2013 Annual Meeting is critical to the future of Tessera
Technologies, Inc. (“Tessera” or the “Company”) and all our stockholders.
Your Board and management team have been restructuring Tessera into a
more focused technology innovation and IP monetization company. We have
changed our Board, changed our management and changed our strategy. The
new strategy has been working well, creating near-term value and
positioning us to drive greater returns over the long term.
The financial markets are paying attention and recognizing our progress.
Since we began to implement Board-approved changes in August 2012, the
Company’s stock has risen by over 33%, while our peer group has only
risen by approximately 11%.
Starboard Value LLP (“Starboard”) has stated that – if elected – it
would initiate a three-month strategic review of the Company. We’ve
already completed our strategic review and are executing on the right
plan for Tessera stockholders. Starboard has
offered no detailed plan and no chief executive officer or chairman.
Starboard’s tactics will only put us back, disrupt our momentum and
likely put your investment at risk.
WE ARE OFFERING STOCKHOLDERS THE FREEDOM TO CHOOSE THE BOARD THEY WANT
Since February 12, 2013, members of Tessera’s management, Board and
outside counsel have demonstrated, on at least eight different
occasions, meaningful attempts to collaborate
with Starboard. Our attempts include offering to nominate two
of Starboard’s candidates to the Board’s slate of nominees. Starboard,
however, has continued to rebuff Tessera’s numerous settlement offers.
As we have repeatedly said, we welcome fresh perspectives on our Board.
Thus on April 30, 2013, we expanded the board to eight seats from six, “guaranteeing”
that at least two of Starboard's nominees will be elected to our Board
at our Annual Meeting. The Company has done this by running only a
six-person slate for an eight-member board and with plurality voting,
ensuring that at least two of Starboard's nominees will be elected and we
are giving our stockholders the complete freedom to choose these two
Starboard nominees.
Additionally, we are so confident in our nominees that we also proposed
to Starboard that stockholders have the ability to vote on a universal
proxy card where all nominees are
listed on one card– whether from Starboard's slate or ours – so that
stockholders could easily and freely pick the eight nominees that they
want to serve on our Board from both sets of nominees. Our intent was to
give you the complete freedom to choose the Tessera directors that you
feel will best move the Company forward.
By rejecting our proposal, however, Starboard
is limiting stockholder choice and attempting to force a vote on its own
proxy card where no such choice is provided. This is a
transparent attempt to manipulate the outcome of the election by forcing
a vote that doesn't reflect the true wishes of our stockholders. Despite
Starboard’s rejection of a universal proxy card, the Company will
nonetheless, run a six-person slate for an eight-person Board,
effectively assuring the election of at least two Starboard nominees –
nominees that you will choose.
THE RIGHT BOARD FOR A RESTRUCTURED TESSERA
The newly restructured Board “gets it.”
We are mindful of the role that corporate governance plays in protecting
and creating stockholder value and recognize the importance of adding
individuals to our Board who have directly relevant experience and
stature. Most importantly, each of the nominees
on our slate has top-level experience introducing and monetizing complex
technologies into the market – a critical skill set for a
technology innovation and monetization company like Tessera.
Our search to identify the right people for Tessera’s future has been
underway since last August, and we are pleased to nominate six highly
qualified director candidates with the right mix of corporate leadership
and operational and financial expertise for election at this year’s
Annual Meeting on May 23. Some highlights regarding our slate:
-
We have added five new independent directors since August 2012, and I
was appointed as non-executive chairman in March 2013;
-
Nearly all of our nominees have CEO or CFO-level experience at
companies other than Tessera;
-
Each of our nominees is independent, with the lone exception arising
from my recent appointment as interim CEO and executive chairman in
April 2013; and
-
We have expanded the Board to eight seats but have only nominated six
candidates, thereby effectively “guaranteeing” that Starboard will
obtain at least two seats at the Annual Meeting.
John Chenault
Former Chief Financial Officer, Novellus Systems
Mr. Chenault brings extensive financial, management and operations
experience in the semiconductor industry to his role as a member of our
Board of Directors.
He has served on our Board of Directors since March 2013. He served as
Chief Financial Officer of Novellus Systems, a semiconductor company,
from April 2005 to September 2005, at which point he retired. Prior to
that, he served as Vice President of Corporate Development from February
2005 to April 2005, Vice President of Operation and Administration from
September 2003 to February 2005, Executive Vice President of Worldwide
Sales and Service from February 2002 to September 2003 and Executive
Vice President of Business Operations from July 1997 to January 2002. He
also serves on the Board of Directors of Ultra Clean Technology and
Synos Technology, Inc.
Richard S. Hill
Former Chief Executive Officer, Novellus Systems
Mr. Hill’s robust expertise in executive leadership, engineering and
IP monetization will help guide the Company during this important phase
in its strategic plan.
He has served as a member of our Board of Directors since August 2012
and as Chairman of the Board of Directors since March 2013. He most
recently served as the Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board
of Directors of Novellus Systems Inc., until its acquisition for more
than $3 billion by Lam Research Corporation in June 2012. During his
nearly 20 years leading Novellus Systems, a designer, manufacturer, and
marketer of semiconductor equipment used in fabricating integrated
circuits, Mr. Hill grew annual revenues from approximately $100 million
to over $1 billion. Before joining Novellus in 1993, he spent 12 years
with Tektronix Corporation, a leading designer and manufacturer of test
and measurement devices such as oscilloscopes and logic analyzers. Mr.
Hill rose through the ranks of the corporation, starting as a General
Manager of the Integrated Circuits division, and finishing his time as
the President of the Tektronix Development Company and Tektronix
Components Corporation. Before joining Tektronix, Mr. Hill worked in a
variety of engineering and management positions with General Electric,
Motorola and Hughes Aircraft Company. He has served as a past Chairman
and member of the University of Illinois Foundation. In this capacity,
Mr. Hill has had direct experience in helping the University of Illinois
monetize the University’s patents with the very same licensees Tessera
currently has. Presently, he is a member of the Boards of Directors of
Arrow Electronics, Inc., Cabot Microelectronics Corporation, LSI
Corporation and Planar, Inc.
John H.F. Miner
Former President, Intel Capital
Mr. Miner’s experience in the technology industry and growing new
businesses, both organically and via external initiatives, will help
guide the Company as it continues its focus on developing and selling
advanced technology.
He has served on our Board of Directors since March 2013. He is a
venture capitalist and a Managing Director of Pivotal Investments LLC,
focused on investing in companies developing clean technologies for the
sustainable economy, which he joined in January 2009. He is the former
President of Intel Capital, Intel’s strategic investment arm, and was an
Intel corporate vice president. Mr. Miner retired from Intel Capital in
2005. Prior to Intel Capital, Mr. Miner was instrumental in leading
Intel’s entry into new market segments as an Intel Vice President and
General Manager of the Communications Products Group, the Enterprise
Server Group, and General Manager of Intel’s desktop motherboard and PC
building-blocks business. He is currently a member of the Board of
Directors of LSI Corporation and three private company boards, in
addition to his service in numerous community activities.
David C. Nagel, Ph.D.
Former Chief Executive Officer, PalmSource
Dr. Nagel’s industry knowledge, technical expertise, and long
experience in monetizing high-tech IP assets have been a cornerstone of
the success of the Company’s IP business.
He has served as a member of our Board of Directors since May 2005. He
was most recently President and Chief Executive Officer of PalmSource,
Inc., a leading provider of operating system software platforms for
smart mobile devices, from 2001 to 2005, when he retired. Prior to
PalmSource, Dr. Nagel was Chief Technology Officer at AT&T and the first
president of AT&T Labs, from 1996 to 2001. During that time he also
served as Chief Technology Officer of Concert, a joint venture between
AT&T and British Telecom, from 1999 to 2001. While at AT&T, Dr. Nagel
spearheaded the transition of AT&T’s technology from circuit-switched to
packet-switched and oversaw the development and award of more than 5,000
patents. From 1988 to 1996, Dr. Nagel held various positions at Apple
Computer, Inc., and during his tenure, the company developed and
introduced Quicktime, the industry-leading multimedia processing
technology that provided the foundation for iTunes; introduced system
wide search and speech recognition technology into the Apple operating
systems; and developed and introduced numerous other industry-leading
software and hardware innovations, such as the high-speed Firewire
serial interconnect system. Dr. Nagel is a member of the Board of
Directors at Vonage Holdings, Inc. and Align Technology, Inc.; and
Trustee of the International Computer Science Institute. He is the
co-editor of Aviation Human Factors. Additionally, he served for five
years on President Clinton’s first President’s Information Technology
Advisory Committee. Dr. Nagel was previously a member of the Board of
Directors at Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. and Openwave Systems, Inc. (now
known as Unwired Planet, Inc.).
Timothy J. Stultz, Ph.D.
Current Chief Executive Officer, Nanometrics
Dr. Stultz brings 20 years of executive management, and operational
and strategic development experience in IP monetization and, technology
and capital equipment manufacturing.
He has served as a member of our Board of Directors since August 2012.
Since 2007, he has served as President, Chief Executive Officer and
member of the Board of Directors of Nanometrics Incorporated, a leading
provider of advanced, high-performance process control metrology and
inspection systems used primarily in the fabrication of semiconductors,
high brightness LEDs, data storage devices, and solar photovoltaics.
Before joining Nanometrics in 2007, Dr. Stultz served as President and
Chief Executive Officer at Imago Scientific Instruments Corporation, a
manufacturer and distributer of metrology and analysis equipment for the
microelectronic and general research markets. Dr. Stultz was integral in
Imago’s development from its university origins to an international
entity by creating strategic partnerships with larger venture capital
groups and corporations with greater market reach. Prior to Imago, one
of Dr. Stultz’s most notable roles was as Vice President and General
Manager of the Metrology Group at Veeco Instruments. Under his
leadership, the Metrology Group brought to market the first fully
automated Atomic Force Microscope for use by leading chip makers. By the
end of his tenure at Veeco, Veeco’s global market share in high-end
metrology systems had grown to nearly 75%, from less than 10% when he
assumed leadership of the Metrology Group.
Christopher A. Seams
Current Executive Vice President of Sales & Marketing, Cypress
Semiconductor
Mr. Seams brings extensive management, sales and marketing, and
engineering experience in the semiconductor industry to his role as a
member of our Board of Directors.
He has served on our Board of Directors since March 2013. He has been an
Executive Vice President of Sales & Marketing at Cypress Semiconductor
Corporation, a global semiconductor company, since July 2005. He
previously served as an Executive Vice President of Worldwide
Manufacturing & Research and Development of Cypress Semiconductor
Corporation. Mr. Seams joined Cypress in 1990 and has held a variety of
positions in process and assembly technology research and development
and manufacturing operations. Prior to joining Cypress in 1990, he
worked as a process development Engineer or Manager for Advanced Micro
Devices and Philips Research Laboratories. Mr. Seams previously served
as a member of the Board of Directors of Sunpower Corporation. Mr. Seams
is a senior member of IEEE, serves on the Engineering Advisory Council
for Texas A&M University, and was a board member of Joint Venture
Silicon Valley.
THE RIGHT STRATEGIC PLAN TO DRIVE GROWTH AND MAXIMIZE STOCKHOLDER
VALUE
We have reviewed the "plan" that Starboard proposes for the business and
view it as a copy of ours with three key differences: 1) We believe that
continued investments in research and development (“R&D”) are critical
to the successful monetization of our Invensas and IP portfolios; 2) We
believe that the value to be achieved from a strategic partner in DOC
will be maximized by a limited amount of investment through year end;
and 3) We have recently reviewed all aspects of our business and are
executing on our plan. Starboard needs at least three months after our
stockholder meeting just to learn more about our business.
Our strategic plan includes long-term growth
for our IP business through new customers in faster growing
markets, Invensas technology and selective acquisitions of patent
portfolios. Factors driving IP growth:
-
Invensas xFDTM multi-chip technology already being adopted
and rapidly gaining traction;
-
Our targeting of new licensees outside of our traditional DRAM
customer base such as in the mobile sector; and
-
Market acceptance of 3D packaging as the optimal path to advance the
next generation of semiconductor technology.
We have clear financial targets and expect to achieve our target model
in the IP segment in 2014, including a 50% target for operating margin
and for our IP revenues to grow at a CAGR of approximately 20%,
generating over $400 million by year-end 2016.
For DOC, our 2013 strategic plan is focused on
maximizing stockholder value. As a result of the completed
strategic review under the direction of the Board, DOC immediately took
a first step at maximizing value by shifting from a vertically
integrated, highly capital intensive manufacturing strategy to an
approach that solely focuses on our core IP and know-how in mems|camTM
and imaging processing software. The leadership team is intent on
leveraging the advantages of the mems|cam technology we have developed
by pursuing strategic alternatives for DOC such as a joint venture, a
strategic partnership, an outright sale, or a licensing agreement. We
target to complete this initiative no later than the end of 2013.
Furthermore, we will limit our financial commitment to no more than $50
million from now until year-end. These funds will be used to prove the
viability of cost efficiency, high yield and high volume manufacturing
of our mems|cam technologies. In short, we seek to maximize the
near-term potential return to stockholders by proving commercial
viability via a supply chain through strategic partners. These are
extremely critical milestones to maximize the value of any transaction
and are within a near-term time horizon.
With regard to operating expenses, we are already executing on
initiatives to further reduce our sales, general and administrative
expenses. We announced DOC and corporate overhead cost reductions of
approximately $78 million, or 45% on an annualized basis, on March 21,
2013. We are divesting the Charlotte, NC facility and the Silent Air
Cooling business unit of DOC and will close the Zhuhai, China facility
by the third quarter of 2013.
We have a plan to prudently and systematically
return episodic revenues to stockholders. On our April 25,
2013, earnings call, we announced a new capital allocation program that
would allocate portions of our episodic revenue for dividends,
reinvesting in the business for continued growth, and opportunistically
buying back shares to support investor liquidity. As we described on
that call, episodic revenue includes non-recurring engineering fees,
initial licensing fees, back payment resulting from audits, and damages
awards. Given the nature of episodic revenues, they are unpredictable
and can vary widely quarter to quarter. But as these episodic revenues
come in, we anticipate allocating 20-30% of the episodic gains each to
dividends (quarterly and special); reinvestment in the business for
growth; and share buybacks.
In short, Tessera already has the right plan to
deliver value to our stockholders over the near and long term:
continue to reduce costs, manage capital spending carefully, and adjust
our strategic plan as conditions warrant to ensure attractive returns on
our investments. The restructured Board includes the right mix of
independent and highly experienced directors to oversee the continued
execution of our strategy and positioning of Tessera for sustainable
growth and profitability.
THE STARBOARD “PLAN” OFFERS NOTHING NEW AND DEMONSTRATES A SHOCKING
LACK OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT TESSERA’S MODEL AND IP BUSINESS
Notwithstanding our progress, Starboard, an activist hedge fund owning
approximately 7.7% of Tessera common stock, would like to take control
of your Board and change the Company's direction – all without paying a
control premium.
At best, the few suggestions Starboard has made thus far are actions
that we have already implemented or
announced. At worst, Starboard’s suggestions reflect an utter lack of
understanding of our business. This fundamental lack of understanding of
our IP business will likely create unnecessary risk and destroy
stockholder value.
Reducing IP R&D is a fatal flaw in Starboard’s
proposed plan. Starboard wants to force the Company to
significantly reduce our in-house IP R&D efforts and expenses. Our R&D
initiatives are the lifeblood of the Company. Starboard clearly does not
understand or appreciate that our innovations
drive the sustainability and long-term growth of our IP revenue stream.
Nearly 90% of our patent assets within Tessera Inc., more than one-third
of the Invensas portfolio, and nearly two-thirds of pending Invensas
patent applications have all been developed internally – a key fact as Invensas
will be a critical driver of our revenue growth. Starboard
ignores the importance of SK hynix’s eight-year license agreement for
the Invensas technology announced earlier this year, which is the first
of many more to come, as the market increasingly recognizes the validity
and importance of our Invensas technology.
Starboard’s Peter Feld, in contrast, doesn't believe engineering is an
essential tool in the development of our portfolio; he sees engineering
as a commodity that can “just be purchased from companies who have
failed to exert their rights to those patents.” Under the premise of
“engineering as a commodity,” Unwired Planet (“UPIP”), a direct
competitor of Tessera’s whose board is led by Mr. Feld, has seen its
revenues decline rapidly to anemic levels. This is not surprising. Mr.
Feld’s competency is in investing, not in operational roles at high-tech
IP companies beyond his core expertise. Since becoming UPIP’s
chairman on September 9, 2011, Feld has overseen a company that has
generated a paltry $35,000 in total revenues from the fourth quarter of
2011 to the fourth quarter of 2012, while licensing and litigation
expenses have totaled nearly $20 million and cash loss from operations
have totaled over $56 million in the same period. Under
Feld, UPIP has not signed a single new revenue-bearing license agreement
and has spent approximately $20 million on patent litigation with no
favorable rulings to date. In the more than 20 months that
Feld has been on the UPIP Board, shares have fallen 15% which the NASDAQ
has risen 21%.
Feld’s strategy of morphing UPIP into a patent troll has driven the
company into the ground. Don’t let him do the same thing to Tessera.
In addition, the factually incorrect
third-party analysis of Tessera’s IP portfolio also shows an appalling
lack of understanding of IP monetization. Contrary to
Starboard’s assertions, it is not the newest patents that have the
highest value. Patents generally have a life of 20 years from the date
they are filed. Rarely do inventions stemming from a patent burst into
wide commercial use immediately upon the patent’s issuance. To the
contrary, patents typically have the highest monetization value during
the last five to ten years of their lives. This is a primary reason why
our earlier patents are the ones currently in litigation. Pursuing
litigation now for our newest patents, when potential revenues are
non-existent or minimal, would be the opposite of maximizing the
Company’s revenues and delivering value to our stockholders. But is this
not exactly what Starboard is proposing by “accelerating license
negotiations” or “limiting days of negotiation?” These
are clear signs that Starboard’s fundamental lack of IP monetization
know-how will put your investment at risk.
WE ARE A VITAL PARTNER TO OUR CUSTOMERS, NOT A PATENT TROLL
Tessera has built a mosaic of technology patents and know-how that
provide our licensees with time-to-market and performance leadership.
Tessera continues to invest in these technologies to ensure our
licensees see continued value in the patents and know-how they receive,
and our customers look to our intellectual property to help them bring
new and enhanced products to market. Simply put, Tessera
is a vital partner to our customers, not a patent troll. Our
business model is fundamentally different from UPIP and similar entities
because Tessera is an innovator – a developer of advanced technologies
that lie at the heart of our customers’ products.
TESSERA’S BOARD AND MANAGEMENT ARE ALREADY DRIVING GREATER
STOCKHOLDER RETURN
Tessera’s Board and management are aggressively driving the Company to
benefit from our customers’ continued reliance of our IP portfolio and
the market’s demand for DOC’s superior MEMS-based autofocus technology.
Starboard is proposing that if their slate is elected, we halt our
progress over the next 90 days, while they conduct an extensive
strategic review. We have already done that.
We have a robust and detailed plan.We
are executing on that plan.And we
are making significant progress on that plan.Now
is not the time to disrupt that work.
Please vote for Tessera’s six nominees and make sure that your interests
are protected as your committed and energized Board continues to build
and deliver value for our stockholders, today and in the future.
Like you, we simply want what is right for
Tessera and all of its stockholders.
Your vote is important in this election, and we urge you to vote TODAY
so that your voice is heard. To elect the Tessera Board’s nominees, we
encourage you to vote today by telephone, by Internet, or by signing and
dating the enclosed GOLD proxy card and returning it in the postage-paid
envelope provided. It is imperative to know as a stockholder, voting on
the WHITE card and withholding on some or all Starboard nominees does not
have the same effect as voting on the GOLD card. Only the card that has
the latest date counts. We urge you to discard all WHITE proxy cards
sent to you by Starboard.
Sincerely,
Richard S. Hill
Interim Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman
Safe Harbor Statement
This press release contains forward-looking statements, which are made
pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements involve risks
and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
significantly from those projected, particularly with respect to the
Company’s strategic plans, market opportunities, financial targets,
value creation and stockholder returns. Material factors that may cause
results to differ from the statements made include the plans or
operations relating to the Company’s businesses; market or industry
conditions; changes in patent laws, regulation or enforcement, or other
factors that might affect the Company’s ability to protect or realize
the value of its intellectual property; the expiration of license
agreements and the cessation of related royalty income; the failure,
inability or refusal of licensees to pay royalties; initiation, delays,
setbacks or losses relating to the Company’s intellectual property or
intellectual property litigations, or invalidation or limitation of key
patents; the timing and results, which are not predictable and may vary
in any individual proceeding, of any ICC ruling or award, including in
the Amkor arbitration; fluctuations in operating results due to the
timing of new license agreements and royalties, or due to legal costs;
the risk of a decline in demand for semiconductor and camera module
products; failure by the industry to use technologies covered by the
Company’s patents; the expiration of the Company’s patents; the
Company’s ability to successfully complete and integrate acquisitions of
businesses; the risk of loss of, or decreases in production orders from,
customers of acquired businesses; financial and regulatory risks
associated with the international nature of the Company’s businesses;
failure of the Company’s products to achieve technological feasibility
or profitability; failure to successfully commercialize the Company’s
products; changes in demand for the products of the Company’s customers;
limited opportunities to license technologies and sell products due to
high concentration in the markets for semiconductors and related
products and camera modules; the impact of competing technologies on the
demand for the Company’s technologies and products; and the reliance on
a limited number of suppliers for the components used in the manufacture
of DOC products. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this
release. The Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, including its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2012, include more information about factors that could affect
the Company’s financial results. The Company assumes no obligation to
update information contained in this press release. Although this
release may remain available on the Company’s website or elsewhere, its
continued availability does not indicate that the Company is reaffirming
or confirming any of the information contained herein.
About Tessera Technologies
Tessera Technologies, Inc. is a holding company with operating
subsidiaries in two segments: Intellectual Property and DigitalOptics.
Our Intellectual Property segment, managed by Tessera Intellectual
Property Corp., generates revenue from manufacturers and other
implementers that use our technology. Our DigitalOptics business
delivers innovation in imaging systems for smartphones. For more
information call 1.408.321.6000 or visit www.tessera.com.
Tessera, the Tessera logo, DOC, the DOC logo, and Invensas Corporation
are trademarks or registered trademarks of affiliated companies of
Tessera Technologies, Inc. in the United States and other countries. All
other company, brand and product names may be trademarks or registered
trademarks of their respective companies.
TSRA-G

Contacts:
Tessera Technologies, Inc.
Rick Neely, 408-321-6756
Chief
Financial Officer
or
The Abernathy MacGregor Group
Chuck
Burgess, 212-371-5999
Source: Tessera Technologies, Inc.
© 2026 Canjex Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.